Skip to main navigation
Home
menu
  • Scientific Publications
    • White Papers
    • Clinical Science Compendia
    • Perspectives On Vision
    • Scientific Backgrounders
    • Science and Technology Articles
  • Educational Videos
    • Educational Videos
    • Technology and Clinical Insights Videos
    • Clinical Research Summary Videos

SS-OCT biometers using the Sum- of-Segments method versus using the Mean Group Refractive Index to measure axial length – how does it affect IOL power calculations?

By laia.mehlbaum
December 16, 2024
Alcon Publications
Like 3038
0 Share
SS-OCT biometers using the Sum- of-Segments method versus using the Mean Group Refractive Index to measure axial length – how does it affect IOL power calculations?

• Today’s SS-OCT biometers employ two methods to measure the axial length: Sum-of Segments using individual refractive indices or a Mean Group Refractive Index. 

• The differences in axial length measurement between the two methods are statistically significant and most noticeable in long and short eyes. 

• Axial length determined with the Mean Group Refractive Index is slightly shorter in short eyes and longer in long eyes • Depending on the length of the eye, some newer IOL power calculation formulas may provide better outcomes with the Sum-of Segment method

You are on a website for Health Care Professionals in the United States

By clicking below “OK” you acknowledge that this site is intended for Health Care professionals only
OK Other country
Pataday ® (Olopatadine Hydrochloride Ophthalmic Solution)
Next Post

Pataday ® (Olopatadine Hydrochloride Ophthalmic Solution)

Pataday ® (Olopatadine Hydrochloride Ophthalmic Solution)
  • United States
Privacy Notices Cookie Notice Your Privacy Choices Terms of Use
  • United States
Privacy Notices Cookie Notice Your Privacy Choices Terms of Use